Re: seismology and solar flare prediction

On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:49:28 +0000 (UTC), "Michael Mcneil"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>"Timberwoof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> That's pretty interesting. I've never heard of these objections. Could 
>> you explain the Doppler theory and why you doubt it so much?
>I'll do my best but first you go through the post on the "Sorry I Was
>Wrong" thread; follow the links I gave and do a run like the one I did
>for 1992.
>
>Pick any fairly recent year (because of the paucity of reliable
>information from further back) and match consecutive phases by dividing
>the time of the phases by three*.
>
>Ignore the minutes as far as the division is concerned; however,
>matching the minutes is also important. The quarter “to” and “past” the
>hour are similar, as they tend to produce breezy weather here -and
>although the type of weather is substantially affected by the occurrence
>or likelihood of so called natural disasters, this influence for wind is
>constant.
>
>The nearer the minutes are to “half past,” the more likelihood of an
>“event” but I am not very sure about the effect they have on the weather
>here.
>
>*One gets a better picture for the weather for my region of the UK by
>dividing by six as (in summer especially) the phases that occur at 12
>and 6 (am and pm) tend to produce cooler, overcast -even misty weather,
>whilst 3 and 9 produce humid and thundery weather. Obviously there is a
>similar amount of cloud produced in both cases.
>
>Concerning your post on that thread, I spent hours that night putting
>that together. I didn't know where to find the lists I needed and I
>have yet to include the volcanic activities and the so called enso/lnso
>effects.
>
>I would like to give only the magnitude 7 and up quakes.
>
>I am not counting as proof, the ones I did include that were below the
>desired threshold. On the other hand, having a system for only
>forecasting quakes of the magnitude that should be life threatening is
>not good enough when lower magnitude quakes are still killing people,
>due to the way things are in this the only planet where life is known.


oOthing of which explains why you doubt Doppler shift.

Do you know why the stars are different magnitudes? We shall proceed
from there to cepheid variables, thence to redshift measurements, and
onwards.

If you have an alternate mechanism for the intrinsic values of stellar
magnitudes, and cepheid variables and their periods or magnitude
variations, then I'm all ears.


--
Lt. General, Fanatic Legions.
Commander of Southern Hemisphere Forces.

Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm