
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Timberwoof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > "Timberwoof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > > "George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > "Saint Isidore of Seville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > > > > message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Damn! It looks like the entire West coast might be breaking up > > > > > soon. And, here I live right the the center of it all -- up in > > > > > Northern California. Well, I'm going to book a flight to NYC > > > > > (where it's safe, stable and secure) -- ASAP. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, NYC is overdue for an earthquake as well. You might try > > > > somewhere in central Canada. > > > > > > Central Canada? In the Candian Shield? What, are you NUTS? That > > > place hasn'thad a significant earthquake in -- gosh, I don't know > > > how long! If any place is "overdue," that's it! :p ;-) > > > > > > -- Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com > > > > If you had learned how to read in elementary school, then you would > > know that looking for a place that doesn't have earthquakes is > > exactly what we were discussing. Hence, the reference to central > > Canada. > > George, I know how to read. My father's a geologist and a few basic > concepts did filter through. I think you didn't pay enough attention to > me sticking my tongue out and winking. Even if this is a no-humor ng, > you deserve a raspberry: :-pbpbpbpbpbpbt! > > (BTW, think I have discovered the geographical location of the > sarchasm. Shall I send a rescue party?) > If that was your attempt at sarcasm, I suggest you go back to school and take remedial English. Perhaps you could take rocks for jocks while you are at it.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |