
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Mutton Head <who must be feeling a little sheepish by now @ your friendly neighbourhood butchers block> wrote in all seriousness: news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > You are off topic in sci.geo.earthquakes. Weather is discussed > over there. ------> So how do you like the potatoes? Little more mint sauce with it? (Brings up the wind so I hear.) Where are the other carrots? On to less pressing matters: Seeing as we have a solution of sorts it might be worth comparing the estimated powers of high 7's low 8 earthquakes with curly swirlies. Since we know the approximate value of low range quakes from comparisons to results posted as nuclear weapon tests and various other events, it aught to be relatively easy to guessimate the force involved with super storms. FEB 03 15 26 10.6 41.529 N 109.640 W 1 G 5.3 4.6 1.0 322 WYOMING. Probable implosion in a trona mine west of Green River. One miner killed and ten injured. Slight damage at Green River and Little America. Felt (V) at Rock Springs; (III) at Eden and Reliance. Also felt at Ogden and Salt Lake City, Utah. Up to one meter of surface subsidence occurred in about a 1 by 2 km area above the mine. MAY 15 04 05 57.8 41.603 N 88.820 E 0 G 6.1 5.0 1.0 514 SOUTHERN XINJIANG, CHINA. Underground nuclear explosion. http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/sig_1995.html Which just leaves a couple of anomalies to resolve before we go for the big picture: 1. Days when there are no -or very few quakes. 2. Days when only one region is subject to them. -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |