Re: Reliable Earthquake Prediction

On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:10:58 GMT, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>"Wally AngleseaT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 03:29:42 GMT, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"Saint Isidore of Seville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> Brian wrote in a rather tart reply:
>> >>
>> >> <<
>> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Saint Isidore of Seville) wrote in
>> >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> >>
>> >> > The San Francisco bay area will have a MAJOR earthquake
>> >> > before or on the 28th.
>> >>
>> >> Convenient of you to not say what month and year. In fact,
>> >> your statement is so short on information it is an ASSUMPTION
>> >> that "the 28th" refers to a moment in time.
>> >>
>> >> Brian
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >> OK Brian -> here you go then.  I predict there will be an
>> >> 8.4 magnitude earthquake in the San Francisco bay area
>> >> -- at about 2PM - PDT on 11/28/03.
>> >>
>> >Think about it.
>> >several feet of hail in LA.
>> >Vey big solar flare.
>> >similar to the big solar flare and earthquake in the 1850's
>> >weird stuff
>> >
>>
>> Which solar flare in the 1850's would that be?
>
>http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/solarsystem/perfect_space_storm.html
>


OK, cool.  So a Solar Flare in September 1859 caused what earthquake?

Which solar flare caused the 1906 Earthquake in San Francisco.

If you like there's a webpage full of earthquake stats, and you can
get the Solar flare stuff, to a great degree of accuracy going back 25
years now. 

Go ahead.

I'm not suggesting it's a wasted effort. I may be skeptical, but you
have access to the data, lets see what you come up with.


--
Lt. General, Fanatic Legions.
Commander of Southern Hemisphere Forces.

Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm