Re: Question to the group.

"George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Ian St. John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<snip>
> > > Really?  Where is the evidence to support your supposition that a
> > landslide
> > > had in fact occurred?  Suppositions don't count in geology, or in any
> > > science for that matter.  You should know this.
> >
> > On the contary. Entertaining hypothesis and considering all angles are
the
> > foundations of science. Only those who approach science as a religious
> > belief fail to understand this, and they are usually poor scientists,
> > limited to recycling old ideas.
> >
>
> That's not what I meant.  What I was trying to say was you have to be
> careful about speculative arguments when presenting published findings.
Not
> to do so could cause you to be fed to the wolves, so to speak.  Of course
> speculation has its place.  You just have to be careful when and where and
> with whom you conduct such speculation.

And usenet is way to regulated and restrictive for open discussions, I
gather?