
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Ian St. John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <snip>> > I understand this. But to say that because we did this that we then > directly supported the use of chemical weapons in the war is a stretch, to > say the least. The U.S. had to be aware of the use to which their shipments and inteligence were being pout. And I said that they supported Iraq in the war. I did not say the supported use of chemical weapons. Both Iran and Iraq were assisted to some degree *despite* the use of CWB by both sides. <snip> > > > > > > The point is what the above says about you. You make allegations and > claims > > that you cannot back up and stand by them without fact or evidence. You > are > > obviously in some sort of religious crisis so I will leave you with your > > 'dogma'. > > > > So, you are saying that Saddam Hussein was a saint? One more example of your creative non-sequitors. I can't think of one leader of any country that I would term "a saint". One has to make too many conmpromises. > Are you suggesting that > he didn't do the things he is accused of, I am > despite the tons of documentation > of his atrocities? Do you think the tons of documents (2 million at last > count) were all made up, and therefore do not constitute evidence? Do you > also think Hitler was a good boy? > >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |