Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: save waters & fish from socialism's destruction



No matter what they labeled themselves as, all socialists were in reality
the same as totalitarian fascists. Socialism is about totalitarianism.
Marxism is about B.S., as with all socialists, to justify totalitarianism.
And socialism also predated Marx. The problem with the various governments
you mentioned (and the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Communist
China, Cuba, etc) is that all of them were willing to really follow the
Marxist trash and they became totalitarian themselves, as always.

But I expect that you knew that.  The extreme left in this country seems
fond of trying to re-label anything that reveals their side of the spectrum
as fascism, including the National Socialist German Workers' Party.  And
they like to hide behind the label liberals, knowing that the moniker has
been changed by their rhetoric from a historic title of non-government
(liberal=liberty) to be a title of socialism/totalitarianism/constant
government growth.

Interestingly enough, I suggest you might reread Mussolini's words, the left
and right extremists are now parroting his sayings.  It shows that the
appelation "authoritarian" is apt when applied to socialists.  And all the
more so knowing that the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and Communist
China, both independently slaughtered more people then their brethren in the
horrid National Socialist German Workers' Party.

"no one of importance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> No, what he's saying is that the Nazis, no matter what they labeled
> themselves as, were in reality totalitarian fascists. Fascism is about
> corporatism, at least if you believe Bennito Mussolini.  Marxism is about
> the removal of the aristocracy, and eventually a social levelling with
> workers owning the businesses they work in.  The problem with the various
> governments you mentioned is that none of them were willing to really
follow
> the Marxist theory of continued revolution, they became totalitarian
> aristocracies themselve, unwilling to move forward to true socialism.
>
> But I expect that you knew that.  The extreme right in this country seems
> fond of trying to re-label anything that might be disagreeable on their
side
> of the spectrum as socialists.  Kind of like labelling moderates as
> liberals, knowing that the moniker has been changed by their rhetoric to
be
> a title of denigration.
>
> Interestingly enough, I suggest you might reread Mussolini's words, the
> Republican extremists are now parroting his sayings.  Makes the appelation
> "fascist" seem apt when applied to them.
>





-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----==  Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----



<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.