TURMEL: Alan Young says "kill all the lawyers"

JCT: Not all lawyers can say they're responsible for the 
deaths of 4 epileptics a day (for sure out of the 300,000 
Canadians who knew they had it) since April 17 2002. Not all 
lawyers are responsible for letting 19 months worth of 
Canadian epileptics die. Only Alan Young let 2000 Canadians 
to die. I guess he's trying to hide the seriousness of his 
crime amidst the crimes of the others lawyers. 

Sadly, my motto is forgive and forget so there's no need to 
kill Alan Young, just bar him from Terry Parker's next case 
or let him in and tape his mouth shut. Actually, he's 
already gotten his punishment. Though sticks and stones may 
break his bones, names on net will always hurt his soul.

>Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 20:40:43 -0800
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cannabis Culture Online)
>Subject: CC: Alan Young says "kill all the lawyers"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Law Professor unveils new book, "Justice Defiled: Perverts, 
Potheads, Serial Killers and Lawyers"

JCT: Linking potheads with killers and lawyers is wrong. 

from CC Online
http://www.cannabisculture.com/articles/3221
by Reverend Damuzi
 
RD: Last night at Vancouver's Harbour Centre, former lawyer 
Young 

JCT: Paul Burstein told us in court that Alan Young still 
had the right to represent his client before the Court of 
Appeal. I assumed that meant "still lawyer." Now we hear 
he's a "former lawyer." 

I find it hard to believe that Paul would have lied to me 
about something so elementary. So what's happened in the 
past few months that make Young a "former lawyer?" If Paul 
meant that Young could be there having switched from being 
an advocate to a friend of the court, that would be a cheap 
evasion. 

Hope I find time to delve into whether Alan had the right to 
be before the bar with me. It could be a grounds of appeal. 
Having someone unqualified before the bar with me can 
certainly be argued to have hurt my case. Especially when he 
told me to get out of the way and let the lawyers handle my 
issue. 

RD: spoke on the themes of his new book, "Justice Defiled: 
Perverts, Potheads, Serial Killers and Lawyers," after a 
rousing introduction by Cannabis Culture publisher Marc 
Emery, who explained how he met Young while defending 
against obscenity laws that saw Emery charged for selling 
banned music CD's in 1990.

JCT: And knowing everything Young did to help the government 
beat Parker, Emery's still on Young's team of Judas Goats. I 
wonder if they'll mention Marc Emery's puppet never-elected 
leader-for-life of the Marijuana Party of Canada, Marc-Boris 
St-Maurice, was in the room too.  

RD: Young took the stage and launched into a scathing attack 
that made typical complaints about the criminal justice 
system seem simplistic and incomplete. "We have criminals, 
we have the system, but what we don't have is justice," he 
opened.

JCT: With law profs like Young, what else to expect? 
 
RD: "We should be protecting the potheads and perverts so 
that we can prevent serious crimes, and lawyers stand in the 
way of that. That's why this book is about lawyercide - 
which is not a word in the dictionary, but a universal 
construct nonetheless. They have been hated throughout the 
centuries."

JCT: So Alan's hateful betrayals are just natural to the 
profession? Not to all lawyers. Matt Sagle left the 
profession after Casino Turmel was rail-roaded. So there are 
good ones but they get puked out and leave. 

RD: Young explained that his book wasn't about the exciting, 
misleading kind of court action portrayed on television. 

JCT: His book isn't but the online Terry Parker book is 
about the exciting kind of treachery protrayed on TV. 

RD: Instead, justice's faults lay in the "pedestrian day-to-
day goings on in court" like judges who fall asleep at the 
bench, play crosswords during cross-examinations and lack 
sensitivity to the plights of people facing decades in jail.

JCT: Blaming judges for bad laws. 

RD: "Indifference and elitism are rampant in the 
profession," Young complained. "I'm talking about stuff that 
makes me sick. I can't sleep at night."

JCT: Elitism and indifference make him sick? Wow. What a 
heavy indictment. Tsk, tsk, they 
showed indifference and elitism while Alan killed 2000 
epileptics. Tsk, tsk. 

RD: According to Young, the metaphysics of systemic abuse 
are partly reflected in the observation that what we call 
"justice" is vulgar and narcissistic. No one cares whether 
the accused is guilty, instead they navel-gaze at irrelevant 
matters like the definition of sexual arousal, he said, 
quoting from a case where he defended a dominatrix on 
charges of prostitution. The dominatrix, he explained, was 
the opposite of a prostitute, whose job is to be submissive. 
The dominatrix he defended would smack erections with a 
riding crop and shame her customers. The court, however, 
only cared that her customers got erections, and convicted 
her.

JCT: This must be his most important victory. 
 
RD: Probably Young's most powerful condemnation of the 
system was leveled at its inherent hypocrisy. He quoted from 
studies that showed 85% of law students puff pot, and 60% of 
lawyers continue to indulge in the fun smoke. "I smoked pot 
with judges," he admitted. "I smoked joints with 
prosecutors. How can they get up in the morning and look in 
the mirror when they know they are going to ruin someone's 
life for that very thing. I know judges that go to 
prostitutes and I know judges that go to dominatrixes."

JCT: "Keep the job" is an answer that forgives the hypocrisy 
in my book. I just hope it tempers their decisions while 
they await political rescue from their contradictory 
situations. So this is a cheap shot at the judiciary. 

RD: The problem, as he saw it, was that our society caters 
to the pleasure of indulgence while simultaneously pointing 
the finger of shame and disapproval at it. Are lawyers and 
judges inherently evil? Young says no. They're just "lazy, 
sanctimonious and jaded." Similarly, judges aren't flawed 
characters, but because courts are jammed with morality 
cases against potheads and perverts, serial killers 
sometimes go free.

JCT: So the problem's laziness. The big issue of the day. 

>This article was sent to you by someone searching the 
Cannabis Culture Magazine archives. The URL for this article 
is http://www.cannabisculture.com/articles/3221.html

JCT: Much appreciated. Again, it points out that Young and 
Emery are connected at the hip. Emery killing the Parker 
Pitt victory, the Paquette extension victory, the Young 
betrayal, wasn't accidental. Vultures of a feather fly 
together. Luckily, as GEM recently pointed out in a USENET 
newsgroup, "they can't infiltrate a 1-man band" and it's all 
boiling down the final showdown between the Leader of the 
Abolitionist Party of Canada and the Government of Canada 
and the Supreme Court.  

I always wondered how Alan Young could keep showing his face 
in public after betraying Terry Parker so openly. Doesn't he 
wince every time someone asks a question wondering if this 
is going to be the time they ask about why he worked against 
the Pitt decision and stripped Parker of his life-long 
protection. The only answer I think he might be able to 
offer is "My dominatrix made me do it." 



--
Abolitionist Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer" Turmel
for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution C6
to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm 
http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel 519-756-1325 USENET: can.politics