
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Parker: <**>Umm, I would invite all readers of this thread to google 'positive feedback', and find *one* credible source...<**> -------------------- So, in the spirit of "credibility" he supplies a citation to a posting from a website bulletin board that anyone can post to, like this newsgroup. I will repeat, there is nothing inherently "exponential" or "harmful" to positive feedback. It depends very much on whether you as the designer intend for it to be there, or not. The same can be said for negative feedback. Notice he didn't respond to either of the two specific (among many other) historical examples I gave using positive feedback that made modern civilization possible, including the computers that we use to read and write these messages: the clock escapement and the triode vacuum tube. Yes, you can "google" and come up with all the nutty stuff in the world. All the loony tunes need to do is to selective pick the particular nutty stuff that "proves" their case. I believe that the "upside" of the Internet does on balance exceed the "downside" and will increasingly do so as we come to grips with this new medium. But the downside is definitely something we need to be mindful of and not ignore. It is currently providing an "exponentially growing" forum for loony tunes and pornographers. "Dan Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > "Bill Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote [snipped]
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |