
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On 22 Nov 2003 13:23:45 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Thomas) wrote: >Phil Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... >> You really need a separate UHF antenna. Parabolic would be good. Ch. >> 22 is just across the road from Ch. 67 so you must be using incorrect >> data. > >Not going to happen... if this thing hasd cost 12 dollars more, it >would have been a DirecTV dish instead. ;-) > >Really, I just love a challenge. > >As for the data, that was a guess based on web sites I found on the >'net. I measured as the crow flies to Tuskegee, not knowing where the >tower was. > >Can't pick up either one, so they might as well both be in Botswana >for all the good they do me. > >Missing out on UPN doesn't bother me. PAX would be good for the wife >though. > >Steve City of license is a poor indicator sometimes. They are both a little north of Troy, opposite sides of a county road that escapes me right now, not too far off 231. Put good signals into Montgomery (when they are on). You could get a 7' parabolic UHF antenna pretty cheap a few years ago. Worth it if you really have to watch off-air TV (shudder).
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |