
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > Dear everyone, > > I am doing a project to transfer electrical energy (about 1 W, pulsed) > through the metal wall (5-10 mm thick) of a pressurised vessel with an > efficiency 10%. I have considered the options to transfer acoustically > or optically, but the only suitable method turned out to be the > magnetic one. A primary coil on one side of the wall is fed with > pulsing/AC current, the resulting pulsing/AC magnetic field is > transferred through the metal wall, and the secondary coil on the > other side transforms the magnetic field into electrical current. > > The only problem was that the steel wall absorbed all of the magnetic > field. I had to drill a hole in the wall of the physical model, so > that to allow the passage of the magnetic field. I inserted the > primary coil into the hole perpendicularly to the wall, and put the > secondary coil behind the wall with its axes parallel to the wall (for > certain reasons). Without the metal wall, the configuration of the > primary/secondary coil worked fine. But the introduction of the wall > into the system brought the voltage in the secondary coil close to > zero. It got me thinking -- I decided that even if the magnetic field > lines could get through the hole in the wall along the inserted coil > core, the lines had to return to the other magnetic pole of the > primary coil. And this was where the metal wall was the barrier to the > lines ! I thought that I would have to enlarge the hole and introduce > an air (magnetically easily penetratable) gap between the primary coil > and surrounding metal. > > The question is, how large the hole has to be, so that to allow the > return passage of the magnetic field lines into the opposite pole of > the primary coil ? I thought I could use a simulation package to > analyse the distribution of magnetic lines, and thus I could find out > the effect of the size of the wall's hole on the efficacy of > transmission of magnetic energy through that hole. Can you recommend > me the simulation package which has a short and not-so-steep learning > curve ? > > Your advice would be appreciated. > > Regards, > Va1erian > Valerian, there is an approach which doesn't require you to drill a hole >through > the vessel in order to transmit information into the interior of the >vessel. The > drawback is that it most likely requires more than 1 watt of power. The >approach is the following: On the transmit side form two concentric coils. The >first set is used to generate a large dc field in the metal so that it becomes >magnetically saturated. This will reduce the permeability to near free space >levels. When this occurs you will be able to use the second set of coils to >transmit a ac field into your vessel.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |