
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In sci.optics Chris Hodges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ian Stirling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... >> > Surely LEDs would be better (e.g. Lumileds 5W luxeon star in a range >> > of colours). That would bring the cost down. >> >> The 5W luxeon will produce around 500mw of light, with a very large source >> area. >> IR laser diodes are quite efficiant and cheap, in the 0.5W size, and are >> around 50% efficient as well as being much easier to couple to a fiber. > > I had the glass rod in mind not the fibre, but that doesn`t really > detract from your main point. > > I thought the efficiency of the LEDs (not white) was rather better > than that. I also had some vague idea that a solar cell (assumed to > be Si) would be losing efficiency into the IR (although I guess that > wouldn`t hold for the 8xx nm ones), so you would want visible laser > diodes, and you don`t get so much power for your money there. I also > thought that the LEDs would be easier to drive. LEDs are a bit easier to drive. You need to get quite far into the IR for Si to lose efficiancy. White LEDs have around the same efficiency as halogen lights, maybe 5-10%. AIUI, the best performers are some blue LEDs, with an efficiency of some 25%. -- http://inquisitor.i.am/ | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Ian Stirling. ---------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------- All I want is a warm bed, a kind word and unlimited power -- Ashleigh Brilliant.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |