
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Well now KC try asking any of the major metal detector companys how thier equipment operates and why. You will not get much satisfaction even though they do work Phill-az KC Armstrong wrote: > "toadmonkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:33:25 GMT, phill-az <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >Dang TM You cross posted and we get to hear from a real idiot. You are > correct in that all metals put > > >forth a geo chemical halo. Most mining companys today use this method of > prospecting. There is a course > > >of study offered at the Makay school of mines in Reno NV. I do not know > much about it but do know that it > > > > > >is used very successfully by a number of large mining firms in northern > NV. There have been several books > > > > > >written on the subject also. > > >Phill-az > > > > > Thanks Phil. I've been itching to pick up that geochem meter from Action, > but a > > bit leary as I don't know anything about that stuff. Oh yeah, the Mackie > (sp?) > > School of Mines is one of the best. > > > > Also, what do you know about Action Mining in Portland? They have the > meter I'm > > looking at getting, but they couldn't give me any straight answers. Like > the > > price they gave me was far less than the internet price, they couldn't > decide if > > it came with a booklet or not (as advertised), and even then tried telling > me > > it's good for precious metals only. > > Treat that as a blood red warning flag. Since at least the 1920's there have > been companies selling "long range detectors" as I discovered in reading a > 1920s property report. It could be that one is now offering a gechemical > detector. I've contacted companies offering these detectors and they have > refused to say what physical principal was involved. Having once worked for > a geophysical equipment manufacturer I know that an honest professional > company will explain how it's product works in general with the statement > that it has better features whose details might be secret (like lower noise > in the amplifiers or patented pickup coils). > > KC
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |