Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Built to Last??



I'm not so sure "a real frame" is a feature ensuring or even
contributing to longevity.  One concern is, even if the frame was
painted and finished carefully there will be many pockets to trap dirt
and salt.  For years it seemed pickup truck frames and suspension were
not even painted, relying on a little extra thickness to provide a
"corrosion allowance."  Our 1980 FORD Fairmont had its barely painted
oil pan and rear axle cover rust through. Corrosion protecting a
multi-leaf leaf spring is a daunting task.

My vote for a long lasting, repairable and maintainable vehicle is a
RWD Volvo, either 240 or 740 series.  740 is much more refined
compared to 240. My current ride is a 240 wagon with 230,000 miles.
I've had several 240 wagons.  In some ways I think they are the
perfect vehicle.

On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 19:04:36 GMT, Alpinekid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>snip<< 
>Suppose I wanted to rebuild a car to last. What would be a good car to 
>start with, something with a real frame, and what would be the best 
>stuff to use, axle drive train etc. The goal would be to have a car that 
>could be maintained myself and would be a general driver car. Assume I 
>would have a fair homeshop and average metal working skills. I would 
>want a mininum or no of specility "dealer only" parts. After it was done 
>I would not want to continually work on it.




<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.