Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: LED Luminosity debate continues...



Hi Daniel,

Daniel Stern Lighting wrote:

> A. Evidence of serious gaps in your knowledge of LED and light science

Huh? Please substantiate this absurd claim.

> B. Repeated and unsupported assurances that your device works

OK, fair comment.

> C. Repeated pleas for just shy of a million US dollars

Perhaps your scepticism is more a reflection of your own transferred values 
as opposed to an accurate description of my own. I prefer to trust a man 
until he proves untrustworthy. Before you go shooting off at the mouth (or 
keyboard as the case may be) would you please buy me a camera so I can 
shoot some photo's for you to see. That I am not posting under a psuodenum 
should indicate to you a measure of goodwill on my part.

So far as supporting evidence is concerned, have you any suggestions as to 
how this may be accomplished. I have some prototypes that I could furnish 
to a lab for independent verifications of the claims, if you would care to 
underwrite the cost.

In addition to PWM methods in which others have discussed, and fallen well 
short of the mark, there are other methods of driving multiple LEDs. I have 
covered the thermocouple concept in other NG posts. Perhaps then it would 
be more accurate to describe the module as a driver.

In any case, thank you for your feedback.

Peter Lowrie



<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.