
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Actually normal-comfort-zone Humidity will disperse heat throughout the abode more evenly. If its too dry, there will be more cold spots. And it DOES save energy. We have spent millions just to research this out and The "Information Kriminal Nick" Says otherwise. Gee, I wonder why humidifiers are such a top demand item in most homes and business's. And they do keep furniture etc from drying out. Along with human and pet nasal passages. Lets take Phoenix Arizona as an axample. Approx 10% humidity is normal. Many times the daytime temperature can attain roughly 120ºF. Yet due to the low humidity the human body is not unindated with overtemp and can also cool itself more efficiently by fast evaporation of the bodies sweat. We at one point also made sure that the humidity inside of space suites and capsules were at the most efficient level to guarentee health and comfort along with efficiency. By the way... Very low (frozen) humidity in very cold climates does make survivability more attainable. But Soak the individual creature with water at very low climates and that creature will lose core temperature very rapidly and cease mortality. Nick ..You might access the Nasa studies performed in the 1960's that were merely a backup of studies completed 50 years earlier. Rockwell's Biomedical Division has a subdivision that did those studies for Nasa.. Which means you have 2 sources on information. Is Villanova noted for their scientific research? ;-p [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Fringe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I recently read an article on MSN about increasing humidity to save on > >heating since the body can tolerate lower temperature better if humidity is > >higher. > > Sounds like bad advice. Where did you find this article? It is true you can > turn down the thermostat a few degrees if the house air is more humid, but > it takes energy to evaporate water, and making the house air more humid with > a humidifier almost always costs more in heat energy than you save by turning > down the thermostat. A perfectly airtight house would be an exception, but > it wouldn't need a humidifier :-) > > Is there any combination of air leakage and thermal conductance in which > humidification would save energy? If so, air-sealing would save more, or > a latent air-air heat exchanger... > > >...there isn't a need to buy an especially fancy but efficient model or one > >that uses too much electricity. Any recommendations for a model suited for > >my purpose? > > If you caulk and air-seal your house, the heating bill will decrease and > the indoor humidity will increase. Andersen says the normal activities > of a family of four evaporate 2 gallons of water per day into house air. > > Nick
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |