
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Makes sense to me. "Robert Kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oops, you are correct, Philip. My last post to Scott indicated my leaning > towards a bio pond. It has also been suggested that such a pond, though, > would at least act as a filter if biodegradation did not occur. > > I hope you don't mind I bcc'd you to avoid the spambots. Thank you for > your input. > > Bob > > > > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Philip wrote: > > > I doubt the feasibility of a bio pond. Biodegradation of TCE involves > > cometabolism under aerobic conditions and u need a large source of electron > > donars to power the microorganisms. The stream, presumably clean is devoid > > of organic substrates. > > > > Best way to go is still air stripping thro' some kind of artificial > > waterfalls or series of steps. u can even argue for natural attenuation.... > > the cheapest of all options. > > > > philip
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |