
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Greg Locock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul_Ktop-posted & wrote: > > "Jeff Finlayson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > >>Paul_K wrote: > >> > >>>Stress results from modal analysis can be used to locate weak spots, of > >>>course remembering not to take those stresses literally but only for > >>>comparison between different portions of the structure and only in the > >>>same mode. > >> > >>That will only be useful if the part/structure is loaded so that mode(s) > >>gets excited. Also, you couldn't compare a hot spot in one mode to a > >>hot spot in another mode. > > You are 100% right, thank you for replying. Could you direct me to some > > published references to prove this point? > > > > thanks > > Paul > He is not 100% right. > > Fatigue analysis of structures is done successfully using FEA. This > implies examining the stresses due to many modes at any particular point > on the structure, since the waterfall plot used to excite a fatigue > model is based on the total signal(s) exciting the structure, not one > frequency at a time. > > Cheers > Greg Locock Again, you are referring to a transient analysis, not an eigenvalue (modal analysis) one that is in question here.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |