Re: Are these platitudes?

No One wrote:
> 
> > > >> >The outcome depends upon decomissioning and how the next five or six
> > > >> >Chernobyles are going to pan out.
> > > >>
> > > >> Where are these five or six Chernobyls?
> > > >
> > > >They will be on CNN.
> > > >Just wair.
> > >
> > > You mean you don't know where they are?
> >
> > France is next, of course.
> > Followed by something in the far east.
> 
> Hum. . .The last time I checked no one other than the USSR used the
> Chernobyl type plants.  The same accident in any other plant, which I'm not
> sure could even happen, would not be any where like Chernobyl.  You'd lose
> the plant, although the Russians are still running Chernobyl's other
> reactors, but you'd not have the wide spread rad problem.

In response to evidence of numerous separate recent CO fatalities 
(http://tinyurl.com/xe7b)
Lancaster says, "CO poisioning was extremely rare 
before the recent widespread release of very low cost detectors.
It is an easily avoidable risk of utterly negligible consequence today."


--- Graham Cowan
http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/Paper_for_11th_CHC.doc --
fireproof fuel, real-car range, no emissions