Re: eer

"Bobster ." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 14 Nov 2003 21:11:26 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (FEerguy9) posted:
We don't need oil.
We don't need batteries.
We don't need internal combustion engines. We don't need fusion.
We don't need hybrids.
We don't need hydrogen-powered cars.
We don't need ethanol.
We don't need natural gas.
We don't need methane.
We don't even need efficiency.
We don't even need conservation.
All we need are the renewable energy sources that God - in His infinite
wisdom -- provided us.
Well we already have that, albeit expensively converted to electricity.
What we need (according to you) instead of all of the above, is a piece
of pie-in-the-sky apparatus that does not exist. Make you think, Frank?
Thought not :)
######################################
C'mon now,he did say "we don't even need
efficiency", And while it may be nice to have, we son't need it at
first,certainly at first.
Obviously his goal is renewable and sustainable energy, and any kind of
a fool knows it's going to cost more. But, when you add in the cost of
warfare to meet our energy needs, which will obviously happen, The cost
of renewables pales in insignificance.
Energy independence is my main goal, which ever
way we can get it. I'd say it's a matter of national security.

****************************************
I don't know what to say about your comment that the
apparatus doesn't exist. It quite obviously does..
*****************************************

Ummm, no it doesn't.  Even Frank, the guy spamming a dozen or
so newsgroups with this crap every few weeks will admit that.

Oh ye who believes everything he reads......


K. Jones


<snip>