
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 05:20:16 -0900, Floyd Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gave us: >"Daniel L. Belton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>DarkMatter wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 09:08:54 GMT, "Daniel L. Belton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Gave us: >>> >>>> Ok... Let me put it into numbers... when overclocking my >>>> computer, I get approx. 400 mhz more out of it when using >>>> arctic silver over the white goop... >>> Being an overclocker, you should know better than to give the >>> multiplied number as in 2.4 GHz OC'd to 2.8, a 400MHz gain. >>> Bullshit. >>> That is bullshit. What is the FSB clock change? That is >>> the only >>> one that REALLY matters. >>> BTW, if that is not really your valid e-mail, it is illegal >>> to use a >>> dot gov addy if it isn't legitimate. You could get nailed. >> >>ok... on a PIII rated at 133 mhz FSB, I can run it at a 168 mhz >>FSB with Arctic Silver... With the white silicone, I can get no >>more than 147 mhz... > >So it actually doesn't make any difference... or at least any >significant difference. 18 Mhz on the FSB does make for a gain, but it could very well have been differences in mating efficiency that accounts for much of it.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |