
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Velocity of a falling bullet
- __From__: John Larkin
- __Subject__: Re: Velocity of a falling bullet
- __Date__: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 09:58:47 -0600
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 00:28:10 -0500, "Paul R. Mays" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>"John Larkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 20:25:26 -0500, "Paul R. Mays" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >Nope ...wrong anwser....
>>
>>
>> Don't be obnoxious.
>
>But I'm good at it.... ;)
>
Oh, you're an artist! Well, in that case, do your best.
John
- Re: Velocity of a falling bullet, (continued)
- Re: Velocity of a falling bullet,
Jim Thompson
- Re: Velocity of a falling bullet,
Don A. Gilmore
- Re: Velocity of a falling bullet,
John Larkin
- Re: Velocity of a falling bullet,
Paul R. Mays
- Re: Velocity of a falling bullet,
John Larkin
- Re: Velocity of a falling bullet,
Paul R. Mays
- Re: Velocity of a falling bullet,
Mark Folsom
- Re: Velocity of a falling bullet,
Pat Ford
- Re: Velocity of a falling bullet,
Jim
- Re: Velocity of a falling bullet,
John Larkin
- Re: Velocity of a falling bullet,
Paul R. Mays
- Re: Velocity of a falling bullet,
Paul R. Mays
Re: Velocity of a falling bullet,
Gareth