
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls
- __From__: Mike Engelhardt
- __Subject__: Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls
- __Date__: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 05:56:22 -0600
Larry,
>>Fascinating viewpoint. I certainly do
>>see it talk about LTspice as much as
>>anything else and attempts to deny that
>>lame.
>
>I read 9 sentences about other stuff, 3
>sentences about LTspice, one of which is
>clearly identified as conjecture. That
>makes about a quarter of the post about
>LTspice.
Gee, I never counted. Let's see. There's 394
charactors about PSpice, and then 338 about ECS
and then 338 about LTspice, not counting the
last 70 charactors of the post, which may or
may not belong to the LTspice word count. If
those do then the bulk of the bandwidth of
the post is indeed about LTspice, otherwise,
it is mentioned as much any anything else.
Well, just be to exact, PSpice uses 17% more
of the bandwidth if you assume a change of topic
before the last 70 charactors. So, your
statement about hardly mentioning LTspice
is a lie, as I've already identified.
--Mike
- Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls, (continued)
- Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls,
Larry Gipson
- Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls,
Larry Gipson
- Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls,
Larry Gipson
- Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls,
Mike Engelhardt
- Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls,
Larry Gipson
- Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls,
Mike Engelhardt
- Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls,
Jim Thompson
- Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls,
Mike Engelhardt
- Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls,
Larry Gipson
- Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls,
Jim Thompson
- Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls,
Mike Engelhardt
- Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls,
Larry Gipson
- Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls,
Charles DH Williams
- Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls,
Mike Engelhardt
Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls,
Jim Thompson
Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls,
Mike Engelhardt
Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls,
Larry Gipson
Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls,
Larry Gipson
Re: Pspice compatibility: Bus representation in subcircuit calls,
Mike Engelhardt