Re: Interesting Letter-to-the-Editor

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        "R. Steve Walz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John S. Dyson wrote:
>> 
>> It is interesting where the 'socialist meccas' like France and
>> Germany  are also having problems with their budgets, and they
>> don't even do a competent job of providing for their own defense.
> ----------------------
> They have the industrial output, they simply prefer to spend it
> on luxuries as long as they can.
>
The cost of defense isn't really that great (very few defense
plants per-se in the US.)  It is that the LAZY-ASS socialist meccas
choose to suckle off the American teat.

> 
> 
>> If they provided for their defense, it wouldn't really make that
>> much difference to their budgets, because it is the morally
>> destrictive socialist programs that cost so very much!!!
> -------------------------
> Social programs are EVIDENCE or morality, they don't DESTROY 
> morality, except the stupid hidebound antisexual forms.
> 
Don't you understand anything about the psychological aspects
of enabling (or encouraging) stupid behavior?  Of course you
don't.  (It isn't really 'morality' or 'ethics' that are actually
destroyed, it is more that STUPID behavior is encoraged by
socalist programs.)

Socialism is plain and clear evidence of social decay -- whereby
the basis of growth and encouraging productive behavior (and
discouraging stupidity) is long forgotten.  So, it is VERY CLEAR
that the regression in France (and somewhat Germany -- and
other wakko-leftist regimes) is progressing quite sadly.  (Geesh,
they obviously don't even learn from their mistakes WRT the
anti-Jew attitudes.)  The 'new' mistake of embracing the terrorists
(e.g. Saddam) seems to result from an overwhelming growing
stupidity.

John