Re: Good enough for crypto?

Gregory G Rose wrote:

[snip]
> ........ That buzzwords like "infinitely
> recursive linear feedback shift registers" and
> especially "paranormal" lead to skepticism.

Possibly 'paranormal' was a high exaggeration of what
is currently yet poorly understood. BTW, long time
ago someone in a chat mentioned to me of a 1/f noise,
saying that the mechanism behind it wasn't yet clear.
Could somebody perhaps say something about that type
of noise in relation to obtaining true randomness
in practice (the role it plays, etc. etc.)? Thanks.

M. K. Shen