www.Usenet.com
Group Index
__Thread Index__
[
__Earlier messages__
]
Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Ernst Lippe <12/04/2003>
Re: What 'NSA'?
__From__
: Bill Unruh <12/04/2003>
Re: What 'NSA'?
__From__
: Tonton <12/04/2003>
Re: What 'NSA'?
__From__
: Stephen Robert Norris <12/04/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: R3769 <12/04/2003>
Re: What 'NSA'?
__From__
: Tom St Denis <12/04/2003>
Re: newbie: Please help
__From__
: David Sexton <12/04/2003>
What 'NSA'?
__From__
: Bob's Friend <12/04/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Mok-Kong Shen <12/04/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Mok-Kong Shen <12/04/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Scott Wilber <12/04/2003>
Re: document.write within a random number generator
__From__
: Francois Panneton <12/04/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: r.e.s. <12/04/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Scott Wilber <12/04/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Scott Wilber <12/04/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Scott Wilber <12/04/2003>
Re: What 'NSA'?
__From__
: Mailman <12/04/2003>
Re: What 'NSA'?
__From__
: Mxsmanic <12/04/2003>
Re: What 'NSA'?
__From__
: Don Bruder <12/04/2003>
What 'NSA'?
__From__
: Bob's Friend <12/04/2003>
Re: Open Question - Is there an estimate for the amount of entropy in a random source with a normal distribution?
__From__
: Scott Nelson <12/04/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Mok-Kong Shen <12/04/2003>
Re: document.write within a random number generator
__From__
: Benjamin Choi <12/04/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Mok-Kong Shen <12/04/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: r.e.s. <12/04/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Scott Wilber <12/04/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Scott Wilber <12/04/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Scott Wilber <12/04/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Scott Wilber <12/03/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Scott Wilber <12/03/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: r.e.s. <12/03/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Ernst Lippe <12/03/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Rob Warnock <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Scott Wilber <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: David Wagner <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Scott Wilber <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Scott Wilber <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Paul Crowley <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Paul Crowley <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Scott Wilber <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Phil Carmody <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Gregory G Rose <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Scott Wilber <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Peter Fairbrother <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Mok-Kong Shen <12/02/2003>
document.write within a random number generator
__From__
: CRS <12/02/2003>
Re: Open Question - Is there an estimate for the amount of entropy in a random source with a normal distribution?
__From__
: Terry Ritter <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Bob's Friend <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Mok-Kong Shen <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Tom St Denis <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Mok-Kong Shen <12/02/2003>
Re: Open Question - Is there an estimate for the amount of entropy in a random source with a normal distribution?
__From__
: Scott Nelson <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Bob Harris <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Gregory G Rose <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Scott Wilber <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Mok-Kong Shen <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Mok-Kong Shen <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: David Wagner <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Scott Wilber <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Terry Ritter <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Paul Crowley <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Mok-Kong Shen <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Scott Wilber <12/02/2003>
Re: Transistor Junction Noise
__From__
: David Eather <12/02/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Mok-Kong Shen <12/01/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Scott Wilber <12/01/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Phil Carmody <12/01/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Scott Wilber <12/01/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Mok-Kong Shen <12/01/2003>
frederick, the dregs
__From__
: a.k.a Bruha <12/01/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Scott Wilber <12/01/2003>
CIA+Royalty+Encryption?
__From__
: LordOfCaradja <12/01/2003>
Re: Marsaglia's XOR-Shift (not conditional) PRNG was Marsaglia's XOR-Shift PRNG
__From__
: Mok-Kong Shen <12/01/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Tom St Denis <12/01/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Phil Carmody <12/01/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Richard Herring <12/01/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Ernst Lippe <12/01/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Ernst Lippe <12/01/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Ernst Lippe <12/01/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Mok-Kong Shen <12/01/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Tom St Denis <12/01/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Paul Crowley <12/01/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Scott Wilber <12/01/2003>
Re: Good enough for crypto?
__From__
: Phil Carmody <12/01/2003>
Re: Transistor Junction Noise
__From__
: Allan Herriman <12/01/2003>
[
__Earlier messages__
]
