Re: Reconsidering Halton Arp

Randy Poe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:56:37 -0800, "greywolf42"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Now, I've defined everything for you, and yet you still refuse to
identify a
> >method.  I'm done with you in the thread, unless you care to proffer a
> >single counterexample.
>
> Patience, grasshopper. I said in advance that I expected you would
> answer my questions, and that once things were clarified I was
> prepared to respond. I also said that I bookmarked a bunch of sites. I
> also said I wanted to take the time to read the methods thoroughly to
> describe them correctly. This process will take, given work, etc.,
> about another 24 hours.
>
> I'm no expert, I just skimmed a bunch of stuff. But again, it's pretty
> pointless to use the Hubble constant to generate an x-axis if you're
> trying to measure the Hubble constant, isn't it? If your x values are
> y/H0, what do you think you'll measure for a in the equation y = a*x?

One last time, Mr. Osmium.  I never claimed, nor implied, that anyone is
using the Hubble constant to measure the Hubble constant.

Hopefully this additional post will save you from wasting effort in
attempting to address a point no one made.

--
 greywolf42
ubi dubium ibi libertas
{remove planet for return e-mail}