Re: Let's face facts, mathematicians' shame

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Harris) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> 1.  After years of being called names like "crank", "crackpot", and
> "loon", I managed to find a way to count prime numbers not in the math
> references.
> 
> Now that's a fact and I mention the previous hostility from math
> society to give context.  After all, many of you may wish to reject
> the idea that mathematicians would toss out valid knowledge just
> because the person who found it is someone they hate, but that's
> what's happening.
> 
> 2.  What I found is a recursive function that finds primes as it
> recurses *and* counts, a first in math history.
> 
> 3.  Even if it were a minor result mathematicians could catalogue it
> *somewhere* but instead have been steadfast in trying to ignore it
> completely, showing that more than mathematical issues are playing a
> part.
> 
> Now you may not like me.  You may hate my postings, hate my talk of
> money, and hate the idea that I'm trying to make you think about
> mathematicians gone bad.
> 
> But what about the knowledge itself?
> 
> Are you going to let shallow and childish people like me and the
> mathematicians possibly control the future of the world in ego
> battles?
> 
> After all, if I'm smart enough to find something that counts prime
> numbers that no one else in ALL of human history found, as far as
> anybody currently alive knows, then what else might I know?  I could
> hold the fate of the world, and you wouldn't even know it.
> 
> It's like this fun game.  I'm the genius taking on an entire
> discipline because I can, and you're just some person, who doesn't
> know anything unless I or the mathematicians tell it to you.
> 
> Losers.
> 
> 
> James Harris
> 
> "My math discoveries, found for profit"
> http://mathforprofit.blogspot.com/

fuffy