Re: Reconsidering Halton Arp

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Randy Poe  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:56:37 -0800, "greywolf42"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Now, I've defined everything for you, and yet you still refuse to identify a
>>method.  I'm done with you in the thread, unless you care to proffer a
>>single counterexample.
>
>Patience, grasshopper. I said in advance that I expected you would
>answer my questions, and that once things were clarified I was
>prepared to respond. I also said that I bookmarked a bunch of sites. I
>also said I wanted to take the time to read the methods thoroughly to
>describe them correctly. This process will take, given work, etc.,
>about another 24 hours. 
>
>I'm no expert, I just skimmed a bunch of stuff. But again, it's pretty
>pointless to use the Hubble constant to generate an x-axis if you're
>trying to measure the Hubble constant, isn't it? If your x values are
>y/H0, what do you think you'll measure for a in the equation y = a*x?

What was the evidence for "dark energy" again?


-- 
"Suppose you were an idiot... And suppose you were a member of
Congress... But I repeat myself." - Mark Twain