Re: Reconsidering Halton Arp

On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:56:37 -0800, "greywolf42"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Now, I've defined everything for you, and yet you still refuse to identify a
>method.  I'm done with you in the thread, unless you care to proffer a
>single counterexample.

Patience, grasshopper. I said in advance that I expected you would
answer my questions, and that once things were clarified I was
prepared to respond. I also said that I bookmarked a bunch of sites. I
also said I wanted to take the time to read the methods thoroughly to
describe them correctly. This process will take, given work, etc.,
about another 24 hours. 

I'm no expert, I just skimmed a bunch of stuff. But again, it's pretty
pointless to use the Hubble constant to generate an x-axis if you're
trying to measure the Hubble constant, isn't it? If your x values are
y/H0, what do you think you'll measure for a in the equation y = a*x?

                 - Randy