Re: Prime numbers, my find, and discovery

I think, just before you started the 10-millionth item
on your "mathforfun&profit," someone gave an account
of your work as "like Legendre's method, but streamlined."
    if you are unhappy with that, why?...  if not, then
you should by all means begin to teach it to students, if
his other guage of this method was accurate.
 
ah, but what would Halton Arp have said?...  for the record,
"a LOT of postings" can also be read,
"virutally ALL of the postings," and
we are your only (apparent) fan club -- unless
the FBI pays you throught the blog.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Harris) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> I should be a rather happy guy.  After all, over 18 months ago I found
> this partial difference equation I call dS(x,y), and the sum of dS
> from dS(x,2) to dS(x,sqrt(x)) is the count of primes up to and
> including x.
 
> Now you may have seen a LOT of postings from people trying to attack
> the worth of my find, which can be a healthy process--if they stick
> with the facts.
 
> Maybe that's part of the problem as we know that architects require a
> lot of schooling beyond just art, as they need to know physics, like
> materials science, and engineering, among many other things.

--ils duces d'Enron!
http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2003/031128_iraq_statement.html