
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
couldn't they use an arbitrary pendulum, a particular one, to measure a few experiments?... of course, if you look at the "fractal" of a feather, its density is not just its weight, divided by what it dysplaces in water; eh? [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory L. Hansen) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > Was he really as specific as saying the inverse ratio of their densities? > With error bars small enough to distinguish the truth or falsity of the > inverse ratio claim? I once measured the acceleration of gravity by > dropping things from as high as a few dozen feet with a stopwatch in > hand. Once something starts falling, things move pretty fast. The data > showed the right trend, but would not have supported a constant > acceleration very well if you'd had other hypotheses in mind. The Greeks > might have gotten higher, but I'm pretty sure they didn't have > stopwatches. Nor did they know how to relate a pendulum's length and > period. For that matter, linear regression analysis hadn't been invented --ils duces d'Enron! http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2003/031128_iraq_statement.html
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |