Re: Reconsidering Halton Arp

On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:54:57 -0800, "greywolf42"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Randy Poe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Meanwhile, I'll just note that Hubble's red shift data was published
>> in 1929 (with distances measured by parallax), but the calibration
>> curve for Cepheid variables was published by Henrietta Leavitt in
>> 1912.
>
>Did you have a point to make?

Cepheid calibration 1912.
Big Bang Theory post-1940s.
Cepheid calibration can't be based on Big Bang Theory.
Only understand short sentences?
>> and what "use Big Bang for calibration" means,
>> and I'll explain both Leavitt's calibration and the Cepheid variable
>> method.
>
>Not necessary.  All I've (repeatedly) asked you to do was simply describe
>one, modern distance estimatation method -- applicable beyond the range of
>cepheid variable resolution 

As I asked in your other post, what would "beyond the range of cepheid
variable resolution" be, since those are as far as I know the most
distant sources used for Hubble Law tests?

                      - Randy