Re: Reconsidering Halton Arp

"Robert J. Kolker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > You say it as if he had some a priori reason to think women had fewer
> > teeth--but he had none.  He gives no reason, he simply lists it along
> > a large list of otherwise correct observations.
> 
> Everything has to be checked. Why? Because it could be wrong.

Yes.  Who says he didn't check?  Because everyone who checks always
gets it right?  

Thomas