
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Grant Kiehne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Which [anodizing] would be best........... Unless specified otherwise by your client, I'd go for an oxalic/sulfuric anodize coat, A-8625, type 3, ~ 1.5-2 mils, followed with a NiAc2/Cr2O7 sealing step, then dehydration by baking for 12 hrs at 375 +/- 25°F. Any possible inclusions, defects, outgassing will show up as spalling in the coating. Take care, hanson "Grant Kiehne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Does anyone have experience using anodized aluminum parts in a high > vacuum or ultra-high vacuumm (UHV) system? I am investigating using > some relatively large-area anodized aluminum parts in a system that > must achieve ~5x10^-8 Torr (cool) after baking at 135 deg. C for ~12 > hrs. The alloys are 6061-T4 and 6063-T5. I am familiar with the > standard preparation of aluminum for vacuum service of machining and > hot basic solution etch, followed by hot air bake. This yields a > fresh native oxide on the aluminum surface. My application requires a > thicker oxide layer (microns). > > I have been warned that generally the anodic oxide layer is a porous, > hygroscopic material that is a poor coating for high vacuum service, > due to its high outgassing rate. Yet, anodized aluminum does seem to > be necessary for certain vacuum applications such as systems with > corrosive gases/plasmas. Is there a type of anodization that would be > a practical (but perhaps imperfect) coating for high vacuum service? > For example, would a thin (0.0001"/2.5 micron), sulfuric acid clear > (Class 1) anodized coating be o.k.? Which would be best, low-temp. > hard-coat (Type III) or room-temp standard (Type II)? Should the > coating be sealed and if so, by what method, hot water? Or does the > sealing process just trap water that will later outgas? > > Altenatively, has anyone tried the Cerafuse (Microplasmic) aluminum > anodization process on parts for high vacuum service? Any problems > with outgassing? Other problems? > > Thanks, > > Grant
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |