Re: is "non-removable" a bad feature of the Tungsten T3 battery?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 21 Nov 2003
10:55:08 GMT "Paul Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>hi all
>
>I have recently purchased (actually, am "trying out") a Palm Tungsten T3.
>
>It seems like a great little unit, but I have noticed that the rechargeable
>battery is "non-removable", as it is on some of the other Palm models.

[..]

I believe the cell can be replaced when necessary, but it involves
disassembly of the unit. Note that I am not certain that this
information applies to the T3 but it does apply to the T1 on which it
is based.

David