
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Marvin Margoshes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > "rrs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > What's the best way to purge an FTIR to minimize water vapor and CO2 > > Peaks. > > > I know running a background scan would nullify the effect of CO2 and > > > moisture but nothing beats a "clean" scan w/ minimal CO2 and moisture > > > interference. > > > > > > > > Pass some dry gas through the spectrometer. N2 would work, if clean and > > dry. > > How do you purge the optical bench? Most IR spectrometers I am > familiar with prefer to be N2 purged because water vapor degrades > their optics. That same purge should exit through the sample chamber > to enable a water vapor and CO2 free background. > Richard If you have access to a liquid N2 dewar, then that's the way to go. Better still if you have a bulk N2 installation to take advantage of, but that's a rarity in most analytical labs. An effective N2 purge is not feasible with cylinders due to the volume requirements. A common strategy in trace gas analysis is to place all of the wetted parts of the analytical system (typically a GC) inside a gas tight purge box with a constant flow of He, thereby minimizing the effects of leaks. I could see how that strategy could work well with FTIR systems if your goal is to really get the CO2 & H2O background down. The size of the enclosure required would mean a high volume source of N2 would be needed. Alternatively, one could build a dual bed molsieve trap in front of an air compressor, but the controls necessary to make that work are probably not worth it if the necessary equipment/expertise is not already available. In the long run such a scheme would be cheaper if not quite as effective as liquid N2... Scott McFarlane
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |