
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Thore Schmechtig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > Ahh yes the amazing talk.origins faqs, non-peered review document on guess > > and speculations. If you read the faqs yourself, you will notice there is > > not one instance where it claims abiogenesis was reproduced in a lab. > > First you (what a surprise!) conveniently ignore the many references, > in the toa, to peer-reviewed papers. Second, you lie about the missing > abiogenesis claim. Give us any reason to take you seriously. Well...? > A lie can not be based on a lie.. correct... and you have yet to direct us to anyu scientific journal where they claim abiogenesis has been acomplish in a lab. > > Neither has creation/intelligent design. All (non-faked) evidence > supports evolution, no matter what lies you repeat (or, for a change, > think up) and post here. Evidence is evidence, and can be manipulated... ask OJ Simpon. Aquited in court, found guilty in another.. same evidence. > > Okay, you've had your chance. From now on I will officially consider > you a valid target for mockery and ridicule. There's no reason to > respect either your opinions or yourself. You want to be treated this > way, no problem. do as you wish... it is the typical attitude of people who looses an argument.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |