
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Steven J." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > gravity can be observed. and even falsified. Evolution as the origin
of
> > man
> > > can not.
> >
> > Evolution (being the change in allele frequencies in populations over
> time)
> > is observed, just as watching a planet travel in its orbit is observed.
> >
> >
> > [Jabriol Replies: Misdirection noted. Again Evolution as the origin of
man
> > has not been observed. Can not be duplicated in a lab nor falsified]
> >
> It could, actually, you know. Human fossils in undisturbed sediments
older
> than the earliest known primates would be very disconcerting. If the
human
> LGGLO pseudogene were disabled in the manner of guinea pigs rather than
that
> of other anthropoids, that would be a very severe problem for common
> descent. Humans share a host of pseudogenes and endogenenous retroviruses
> (with point differences in nucleotide sequences arranged in the same
nested
> hierarchy as morphological features) with other primates, especially with
> African apes, and especially with chimpanzees and bonobos. If we shared
> pseudogenes with dogs that we didn't share with apes, or ERVs with
dolphins
> that neither species shared with other cetaceans or other primates, that
> would be inconsistent with (would effectively falsify) common descent
> ("evolution as origin of man").
> >
> >
> -- Steven J.
>
>
once again speculation..
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |