Re: mesosoic placentals

Dawid - don't forget the Aussie Tribosphenic Mammal circa 110MYA
http://www.earth.monash.edu.au/dinodream/inverloc/jaw/mammal.htm

Ps. have to agree instead of information sharing its more like a theological
debate on this site
ED - please help those who are interested from pursuing their own beliefs
without having to be preached to from any creationist/Evolutionist etc...its
really dissapointing


"Dawid Mazurek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In a recent paleontological article I' ve read that the presence of
mesosoic
> marsupials is uncertain whilst in articles from the 70' this fact is
> obvious, some of them are even assigned to ceratin orders (e.g.
> zalambdalestes to glires). What is the current mainstream theory? Is fact
> that placentals fossils  are found in mesosoic is probable? What is the
> current view on zalambdalestid affinities? Sorry for my English. David.
> P.S. Isn't there any way to stop some lunatics form posting creacionism
and
> other crap news to this news group? I look to this group more rarelly than
I
> used to cause the people really interested in paleontology are here in
> minority. Sorry again, I now have my English probably looks like.
>
>