Re: Is Biological Informational (Morphic) Field Plausible??

Before the unconvensional becomes convensional. It has to be
unconvensional, then becomes convensional. In the early 1900s,
when airplanes were first invented. It's unconvensional to
imagine dropping not-yet-discovered atomic bombs thru the
air. These unconvensional ideas and physics became convensional
in the 1942s in the Manhattan Project. Right now. Concepts of 
Consciousness that permeates everything in the entire universe 
down to the atomic level are in the unconvensional stage of study. 
Those who deal directly with Qi or energetic manifestation of the 
non-local informational field knows it as fact. It's like a person 
who witnessed an atomic bomb explosion in let's say the 1700s, he
knows someday physics of it would be discovered. In consciousness
related matter such as Qi healing, etc. many witnesses have seen it 
for what it is. It's only a matter of time before the physics of it 
would be discovered. And it's give or take 50 years when the next
major breakthrough in science would occur. For those who don't
have an idea of Qi or doesn't want to get involved in any of it.
How could you know it doesn't exist when you haven't studied it.
Of course many minds are hardwired to believe only in the "current"
science. It's like prior to 1900s when majority's minds are made up 
that heavier than air object that carries 300 passengers can't fly 
in air, nor bombs as small as TV that can wipe out an entire region.
Similarly, in the future. When the next breakthrough in science 
occurs. We would be dealing with stuff far beyond one's wildest 
imagination. 

c 

 


 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (ghytrfvbnmju7654) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (cinquirer) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ghytrfvbnmju7654) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > It would help if you defined what an informational field was,
> > > and how it was different from any field that contains
> > > information.
> > 
> > By informational field is meant the convensional and unconvensional
> > biological field. Group of atoms that made up cells that made up
> > tissues
> > may form some kind of biological electronics circuits that produce EMF
> > field used in cellular process. This is a known interaction studied 
> > in Bioelectromagnetics. Now I wonder whether single atoms or small 
> > group of atoms can form some unconvensional internal atomic non_local
> > informational field that doesn't rely on convensional circuitry and 
> > convensional field, nor quantum coherence but something inherent
> > within
> > the atom itself...
> 
> "Unconventional"?  Defining vague, undefined terms with other vague,
> undefined terms doesn't help.  The only thing that separates real
> physics from crackpottery is that real physics describes nature
> quantitatively, and not with vague word pictures.  That is why
> real physical theories can make specific predictions, whereas
> vague crackpot theories can scarcely make guesses.  People argue
> about the same religious and political issues for millenia, but
> physical theories can be tested.  Vague ramblings about
> "unconventional" phenomena can't.  So unless you can be more
> specific about what you're suggesting, and I mean with actual
> mathematics, any arguments about it will go on indefinitely.  It's
> certainly not the first time that's happened.