Re: Is Biological Informational (Morphic) Field Plausible??

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (cinquirer) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ghytrfvbnmju7654) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > It would help if you defined what an informational field was,
> > and how it was different from any field that contains
> > information.
> 
> By informational field is meant the convensional and unconvensional
> biological field. Group of atoms that made up cells that made up
> tissues
> may form some kind of biological electronics circuits that produce EMF
> field used in cellular process. This is a known interaction studied 
> in Bioelectromagnetics. Now I wonder whether single atoms or small 
> group of atoms can form some unconvensional internal atomic non_local
> informational field that doesn't rely on convensional circuitry and 
> convensional field, nor quantum coherence but something inherent
> within
> the atom itself...

"Unconventional"?  Defining vague, undefined terms with other vague,
undefined terms doesn't help.  The only thing that separates real
physics from crackpottery is that real physics describes nature
quantitatively, and not with vague word pictures.  That is why
real physical theories can make specific predictions, whereas
vague crackpot theories can scarcely make guesses.  People argue
about the same religious and political issues for millenia, but
physical theories can be tested.  Vague ramblings about
"unconventional" phenomena can't.  So unless you can be more
specific about what you're suggesting, and I mean with actual
mathematics, any arguments about it will go on indefinitely.  It's
certainly not the first time that's happened.