Re: Is Biological Informational (Morphic) Field Plausible??

By informational field is meant the convensional and unconvensional
biological field. Group of atoms that made up cells that made up
tissues
may form some kind of biological electronics circuits that produce EMF
field used in cellular process. This is a known interaction studied 
in Bioelectromagnetics. Now I wonder whether single atoms or small 
group of atoms can form some unconvensional internal atomic non_local
informational field that doesn't rely on convensional circuitry and 
convensional field, nor quantum coherence but something inherent
within
the atom itself... perhaps some nucleus based subtle informational 
system acting non_locally and in higher space. An example of one such 
theory by a physicist is shared in the thread "Are Particles Mini 
Black-Holes & Terminals of Informational Fields?" (For sci.bio.misc
participants... see the thread in the alt.sci.physics.new.theories
group)  in which she mentions how biology may be ruled by such field. 
Sheldrake also mentions about Morphogenetic field. The Japanese 
called it "Ch'i", the Chinese "Qi" and dozens of others. I'd like to 
understand whether embryo growth, etc. are ruled by such non_local 
field or if this field is only interactive with consciousness as 
anchoring interface. 

c

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (ghytrfvbnmju7654) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (cinquirer) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > I've been wondering if an informational field (some called it morphic
> > field) is behind the blueprint of biological growth and repair or if
> > purely biochemical mechanism is enough to explain ALL biological
> > process. By informational (morphic) field is meant an additional
> > extended functionings of the atoms that doesn't rely on quantum
> > coherence, etc. and effects (see related message "Are Particles
> > Mini-Black Holes and Terminals of Informational Fields").
> 
> It would help if you defined what an informational field was,
> and how it was different from any field that contains
> information.