Re: Yet another Budikkka hole: the Reptile/Mammal Colossal Hole

"jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Zachriel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > "jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > "Zachriel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > "jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > <snip>
> > > > > all living organsim are basicly the same for the las few
millenias,
> > > witout
> > > > > much change within themselves.
> > > >
> > > > No. Horses have changed considerably, as have orchids, swallows and
> > corn.
> > > > Many species have gone extinct.
> > >
> > >  there is a thread about horse evolution around there someplace..
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > the fossil record is based on stone impressions of what might have
> > been.
> > > >
> > > > The fossil record is clearly actual remains of organisms.
> > >
> > >
> > > not all the time..
> >
> > That is a meaningless statement unless backed up by actual data. You
> claimed
> > "the fossil record is based on stone impressions of what might have
been."
> > In fact, most fossils are the actual remnants of dead organisms.
>
>
> uh no....
>
> http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/fossilization
<snip>

What are you actually trying to say? As usual, you post some snippet and
assume that you are being clear. Certainly fossils no longer contain the
organic matter of the original organism. However, they are nonetheless
remnants of living organisms.

Your own proffered definition:
fossilization, the process of fossilizing a plant or animal that existed in
some earlier age; the process of being turned to stone

Let me emphasize, "a plant or animal that existed in some earlier age".