Re: Yet another Budikkka hole: the Reptile/Mammal Colossal Hole

"jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Zachriel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > "jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > <snip>
> > > all living organsim are basicly the same for the las few millenias,
> witout
> > > much change within themselves.
> >
> > No. Horses have changed considerably, as have orchids, swallows and
corn.
> > Many species have gone extinct.
>
>  there is a thread about horse evolution around there someplace..
> >
> >
> > > the fossil record is based on stone impressions of what might have
been.
> >
> > The fossil record is clearly actual remains of organisms.
>
>
> not all the time..

That is a meaningless statement unless backed up by actual data. You claimed
"the fossil record is based on stone impressions of what might have been."
In fact, most fossils are the actual remnants of dead organisms.


> >
> > We can see the cell structure.
> > http://tinyurl.com/oyq9
> > We've extracted Neanderthal DNA.
> > http://tinyurl.com/oyqi
> >
> > Please admit this evident fact, or explain why you can't.
>
>
> I am not denying it, nor have I ever denied the existence of the
neanderthal
> and other so called homonids.. remember I am not a creationist. In fact
> Neanderthal is now theorized to have speech, just like us.

What do you assert, then that is not found in a standard biology textbook?


> > > combing the two, is like saying that we
> > > can gain insight in combining astronomy with astrology.
> >
> > The anaoogy is invalid as astrology is not an historical science.
>
> where did you think astronomy had it beginings?

Astronomy was basically created out of whole cloth by Galileo.