Re: Yet another Budikkka hole: the Reptile/Mammal Colossal Hole

"jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...

The world has noted that while you repeatedly demand
proof/evidence/references/demonstrations from others, you have been
unable to offer a shred yourself.  You cannot even meet a simple
request, that I have repeated for weeks, that you **LIST** these
colossal holes you have been pretending exist.

If you cannot even **LIST** them, why should we believe that there
even are any?

Note: creationist letters published as a courtesy in New Scientist
magazine are not the same as peer-reviewed science papers published in
professional, refereed science journals.

Note: argument from incredulity published half a century ago does not
count.

Note: Comparisons of modern birds and reptiles have no bearing on
evolution since no evolutionist claims that modern birds evolved from
modern reptiles.

Note: The Talk.origins transitional fossils FAQ lists over 70
references, many of which are to papers published in professional,
refereed science journals.

Note: Your quiet abandonment of every single thread in which I have
challenged you has also been noted world-wide.

Note: your panicked fleeing from every request that you either accept
or deny (with supportive evidence) the fifty-fifty mix of reptile/dino
and bird features in archeopteryx has been noted.

Now are we ever going to see a list of these "colossal holes" you
invented, or are your own wacko claims the only things that exhibit
colossal holes?

Budikka