Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: TOBS: Yet another Budikkka hole: the Reptile/Mammal Colossal Hole



"jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...

> how has evolution been demostrated in a lab.. have science acelarated
> evolution?
> 
> that would be neat.. what are the name of the new life forms...?
> 
> http://koning.ecsu.ctstateu.edu/Plants_Human/scimeth.html

Your irrelevent reference has been noted and will be dealt with later.

First, you would have to understand what evolution is.  You do not
have this understanding.

This might help, but only if you actually have the capacity to learn:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/faq/cat01.html

Note that the common definition is "a change in the allele frequency
in a population".  These small changes, over time, lead to large
changes in populations.  This is a more generalised definition and is
what genetics and the fossil record demonstrate.

Second:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/speciation.html

Note that the first of these contains over 70 references (just like
the transitional FAQ) many of which are to professional science
journals.

Here is a quote from it: "Digby (1912) crossed the primrose species
Primula verticillata and P. floribunda to produce a sterile hybrid.
Polyploidization occurred in a few of these plants to produce fertile
offspring. The new species was named P. kewensis. Newton and Pellew
(1929) note that spontaneous hybrids of P. verticillata and P.
floribunda set tetraploid seed on at least three occasions. These
happened in 1905, 1923 and 1926."

>From this we can see that speciation (a change in allele frequency)
was observed at the beginning of this century and you, Jabriol, still
have not updated your knowledge.  Now what was that you can claimed
about me not updating my knowledge?

The fossil record demonstrates that species have not remained the
same, just as Darwin predicted.  Over the entireity of the fossil
record, we see species come and go.  There is no evidence that these
species were magically created each time.  There is evidence - in the
form of transitional fossils - that the species changed and evolved.

Get it now?

Now to your "scientific method" URL.  Your reference lists these
items:

Observation
As I have shown above, evolution has been observed.  The whole reason
the Theory of Evolution came about in the first place was because
Darwin observed and theorised upon those observations.  A massive
amount of evidence supporting his theory has been steadily
accumulating ever since.

Question
Darwin observed differences in populations.  He asked the question -
why.  Why were the finches on the Galapagos different despite similar
habitats?

Hypothesis
Darwin hypothesized that populations change - evolve - over time.

Prediction
He predicted that the fossil record would show this.  He was right.

Experiment
Science has conducted many experiments to determine if evolution holds
true - particularly in genetics.  It has proven so.  The more closely
species are thought to be from an evoltuionary perspective, the closer
they are genetically.

Analysis
My analysis is that you are as clueless as you appear.  That you do
not understand, you cannot learn, and you have not a shred of evidence
to support your position, which is why you are reduced to lying and
offering argument from incredulity as your only support.

Decision
My decision is that I will keep on demanding a this list of "colossal
holes" from you until you admit that you cannot supply such a list.

Get it now?

Budikka



<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.