Re: GMO and health impact

On 1 Nov 2003 12:34:04 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Gus) wrote:

>Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> On 21 Oct 2003 09:40:40 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Gus) wrote:
>> 
>> >> GMO per se has nothing to do with health -- for better or worse. 
>> >of course it has, you say the example of "golden rice", i search
>> >examples like this.
>> >or perhaps you mean i am not in the good group? 
>> 
>> I'm not sure what you are asking, and I don't think that is completely
>> due to language. Your question is very broad (or vague), and we have
>> no idea what level you are at.
>
>
>our level: we are 16 years old and we are in a class with science as speciality
>we work on that subject 2 hours per week until februar
>

A few days ago there was some announcement of funding to direct GMO
work to more things that would generally be considered "good". The
examples mentioned involved improving the nutritional content of the
food.

I vaguely recall this was from Bill Gates Foundation. You might check
their web site, or check google news.


What do you think would be good ways to develop food crops?


bob