Re: Epistemologically False Definitions of Evolution.

in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Edser at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/2/03 8:35 AM:

> JE:-
> Incorrect. All random patterns, without
> exception, can be validly suggested
> to be caused by _either_ random or
> non random processes. This is because non random
> processes commonly produce random patterns
> but random processes can only produce random
> patterns, by definition.

This is not true.  Are you familiar with Turing patterns, for example?

Guy