
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Robert Karl Stonjek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > Scientists Take DNA's Temperature > > The temperature most often associated with human life is 98.6 degrees > Fahrenheit, that of a healthy person. Now scientists have succeeded in > taking a different measurement, one they've dubbed the "heat of life:" the > energies involved in DNA replication and synthesis. [snip] > The thermal detection system, which is accurate to a millionth of a calorie, > determined the amount of heat given off when a base pair was inserted into > the DNA strand. [snip] > Comment: > The latest science? Then why do they use a scale that was originally the > measure of a King's stride (yard) foot (foot) or manliness (inch)?? Why not > use the centigrade scale (Celsius) like the rest of the non-monarchical > world (or do you Americans still check imperial measures against, say, the > latest president's dimensions?) > > Kind Regards, > Robert Karl Stonjek. It is interesting that the number 98.6, which every American school child learns, is a direct conversion from the Celsius estimate of 37 degrees that was set back in the 19th century by a German researcher. I suspect that Americans probably relied on an Oxbridge trained Englishman to do the arithmetic of the conversion - an American would have rounded to 99 degrees (and incidentally have come closer to the truth). Of course, Americans are familiar with some metric scales - notice that the heat measurement was in calories. Perhaps Scientific American should have converted that to BTU... ;-)
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |